Bills introduced to repeal the US PVSA

2021-06-13T06:42:04+00:00 June 13th, 2021|Marketing|

US Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) (pictured) has introduced three bills to repeal and reform the ’Passenger Vessel Services Act of 1886 (PVSA)’.

“The PVSA is bad news,” said Senator Lee in a release. “This arcane law benefits Canada, Mexico, and other countries who receive increased maritime traffic, at the expense of American workers in our coastal cities, towns, and ports.

“Reducing demand for jobs and travel opportunities here in the U.S. is the opposite of ‘America First.’ And in the context of ocean liners, this ‘protectionist’ law is literally protecting no one, as there hasn’t been a cruise ship built domestically in over half a century. The PVSA is bad economics and bad law, and it’s far past time that Congress reconsider it,” he said.

PVSA requires that all ships carrying passengers between two or more US ports (a domestic voyage) be US built, owned, flagged, and crewed.

Due to these rigid and expensive requirements, many ship operators choose to domicile and conduct business elsewhere. As a result, these ships cannot operate continuously in the US, and must call at a foreign port in between stops at US ports to remain in compliance with this 135-year-old law.

He continued in his release by saying that by artificially restricting when vessels may call at our ports and serve travellers, this arcane law diverts opportunities for economic activity in US coastal cities to other countries.

For example, instead of spending more time in US ports and cities, cruises sailing from Washington to Alaska must make stops in Vancouver, Canada, while cruises from California to Hawaii must stop in Ensenada, Mexico.

Even intra-island Hawaiian cruises are forbidden – cruises must travel 1,000 miles south to Fanning Island (Republic of Kiribati) to avoid running foul of the PVSA. The PVSA reduces demand for US port workers in dockside maintenance and repair, and hurts job opportunities for those in the domestic travel and hospitality industries, he claimed in a statement.

While Canada serves as a primary beneficiary of the law, which diverts commercial activity to its ports, the perverse incentives created by the PVSA also mean Canada controls northwestern US cruise seasons. During the pandemic, Canada has closed its ports to foreign ships. Cruises cannot sail without this required ‘foreign stop,’ and this move could crush the Washington and Alaska tourism economy.

Details of the bills: –

Open America’s Ports Act

  • Would repeal the PVSA and adjust cabotage requirements accordingly, allowing all ships that qualify under the laws of the US to transport passengers from US port to US port.

Safeguarding American Tourism Act

  • Would exempt large passenger vessels (of 800 or more passenger berths) from PVSA requirements, and adjust cabotage requirements accordingly, allowing these ships to transport passengers from US port to US port.
  • This targeted approach would not affect or harm any existing industry, as there hasn’t been a cruise ship built in the US (and which would therefore meet the PVSA’s high bar) since 1958.

Protecting Jobs in American Ports Act

  • Would repeal the ‘US-built’ requirement for passenger vessels operating between US ports, thereby incentivising US companies to develop voyages that increase traffic and economic activity – and opportunities for port workers – in US coastal cities and towns.